Main
Registration
Login
Welcome Guest

RSS
 
[ New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
Page 1 of 11
Forum » AT-43 Discussions » AT-43 - General » Cogs - building type 1's objectives
Cogs - building type 1's objectives
BanksiDate: Monday, 05-Aug-2013, 6:28 PM | Message # 1
Major general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 417
Reputation: 33
Status: Offline
Before the last game of AT-43 we had a discussion around which objective the Cog's AI unit had to be next to when creating a new type 1.

The thought at the time was it was either the primary objective or the secondary but not both!

If you compare the Cogs A.I. to the Therian creation there is an apparent disadvantage to the Cogs by using the above method, as the Therian do not need to have any objective near them to create a unit.

The Cogs A.I simply states "An Objective" it neither states nor specifies which objective.

From this I deduce that any objective may be used whether primary, secondary or trinary, as long as it has the word "objective" in it's title the Cogs can use it to create a unit.

Of course I know your name, it's your face I can't remember - Parahandy
 
zellakDate: Monday, 05-Aug-2013, 11:15 PM | Message # 2
Generalissimo
Group: Member
Messages: 1529
Reputation: 65
Status: Offline
Do you want a face to face meeting of all 6 Commanders to discuss this ?

Or would you be happy with an online vote ? fie

DEMON : " When next we meet, i shall tear you limb from limb...there will be no escape. "

Hero: " You bring balloon animals and i'll hire a clown..... we can make it a regular party. "
 
BanksiDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 1:12 AM | Message # 3
Major general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 417
Reputation: 33
Status: Offline
Quote (zellak)
Do you want a face to face meeting of all 6 Commanders to discuss this ?

Or would you be happy with an online vote ?


Neither

It's quite simple, the word is objective, it doesn't say anything else!!! Don't add words in the Cogs book that aren't there!!!

Simply I'm not willing to compromise on this one!

The Cogs wont work with those limitations your trying to make.

The Therian don't have the limitations.

Unless you want to remove the Cogs A.I. objective part.

Of course I know your name, it's your face I can't remember - Parahandy
 
MorgothDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 6:25 AM | Message # 4
Major general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 252
Status: Offline
Hi Guys

Just a thought ... aren't MedTec containers & engineers "objectives" ... so u could add one to your squad and get to use the ability as you please. Are you using engineers in your campaign?

I would say your right about "objectives" covering everything that falls into that category ... including engineers,

Walts
Message edited by Morgoth - Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 6:27 AM

"And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him ..."
 
zellakDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 9:26 AM | Message # 5
Generalissimo
Group: Member
Messages: 1529
Reputation: 65
Status: Offline
Quote (Banksi)
Neither


Better to do it face to face.

As a group we are NOT good at online debating.

Lets not take any risks with this campaign please. smile

Quote (Morgoth)
I would say....


Some things are better left unsaid.

DEMON : " When next we meet, i shall tear you limb from limb...there will be no escape. "

Hero: " You bring balloon animals and i'll hire a clown..... we can make it a regular party. "
 
BanksiDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 11:56 AM | Message # 6
Major general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 417
Reputation: 33
Status: Offline
Ok will say this once more

There is no debate and there will be no debate.

The Cogs book was written after Frostbite so the Author knew full well that there was two or more types of objectives.

He has not specified if it was to be one or the other so it is all of them.

Just like in the last campaign this issue with Crevices where the full content was not read properly " The 1/2 the base rule"

We are now adding words into the Cogs book that aren't there.

The only risk to the campaign is people miss reading rules.

Funny there were attempts to Nerf the Karmans and now the Cogs.

Enough said!!!

Of course I know your name, it's your face I can't remember - Parahandy
 
ZealyotDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 10:29 PM | Message # 7
Lieutenant colonel
Group: Member
Messages: 106
Reputation: 16
Status: Offline
Quote (Banksi)
There is no debate and there will be no debate.


Fully Agree.
If the writer of the Cogs book meant primary or secondary objective then he would have stated that in the book.
If we keep nit picking and changing things because one army gets an advantage over another I a specific situation the we all might as well just give up playing the game with different armies and all use some generic army men that have no special abilities or rules, but i doubt even that would solve the problem.

Rant over.

"In brightest day,
in blackest night,
no evil shall escape my sight,
let those who worship evil's might,
beware my power,
Green Lantern's light!"
 
zellakDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 11:06 PM | Message # 8
Generalissimo
Group: Member
Messages: 1529
Reputation: 65
Status: Offline
Quote (Banksi)
There is no debate and there will be no debate.


Okay then, lets play it your way.

I'm unhappy about one player dictating to others.

But in the interests of the campaign, play it whatever way you want.

DEMON : " When next we meet, i shall tear you limb from limb...there will be no escape. "

Hero: " You bring balloon animals and i'll hire a clown..... we can make it a regular party. "
 
BanksiDate: Tuesday, 06-Aug-2013, 11:25 PM | Message # 9
Major general
Group: Administrators
Messages: 417
Reputation: 33
Status: Offline
Quote (zellak)
I'm unhappy about one player dictating to others.


the only dictating is from the rule book

Of course I know your name, it's your face I can't remember - Parahandy
 
CheDate: Saturday, 10-Aug-2013, 11:13 AM | Message # 10
Lieutenant general
Group: Member
Messages: 509
Reputation: 58
Status: Offline
Sorry sad This is all probably my fault. I played the Cogs a couple of times and restricted myself to using secondary objectives. I didn't intend to start another controversy. Let's just go with Banksi and get on with it! Again, sorry for starting it all cry

Wargamers like to paint their privates!!
 
Forum » AT-43 Discussions » AT-43 - General » Cogs - building type 1's objectives
Page 1 of 11
Search:

Copyright MyCorp © 2017