play the rules no advantage to one or the other just play the rules.

As long as a rule tweak effects ALL army's the same, IMHO, then the rule tweak made at the beginning of the campaign didn't benefit any one army, so no adv to anyone, ergo OK!

As z said ... having 10+ civvy's running around is mental! wacko Imagine four army's clashing on the one battlefield ... u could have upto 24 Civvy's all taking soil samples and making a mess with their muddy boots ... tongue no thanks! tongue Civvy's shouldn't be main objectives, just a bit of spice between factions to make capturing ONE a bit of a challenge, without killing him!

I'm sure we decided to make Civvy's immortal before anyone bothered to field them? The fact that the Therian & ONi's control the most isn't a big deal as there's only four in the game just now. It's how I like it, but any suggestions are always fun!

The fact that the Therian & ONi's control the most isn't a big deal as there's only four in the game just now.

There is f%&k all cool about 10+ civil engineers running around every battlefield !!! angry

perhaps we should dump at-43 and all play 40k

a campaign where one faction has an artificialy created advantage whch cannot be changed during a game

Its not artificial, the ONI won the civengs in fair combat.

And it can be changed during the game

come and get them !

Yet again wrong very very wrong, the point of civeng is not about h2h.

Wrong realy very very wrong this was changed after the tarmac space port where 2 were captured, at this point the Blok and Una players should have been able to replace them as per the rules.

Wrong just plain wrong, we are continuing to play a campagne where one faction has an artificialy created advantage whch cannot be chnaged during a game , when Tom played the engineers they were first on the table thus giving tom 150 easy points which could not be destroyed this allowed him to bring on reinforcements turn two. No other player/faction has that advantage. You would target them as a priority turn one.

None of your arguments get away from the fact that one faction is benefiting from a rule change in fact two rules changes, play the rules just the rules .

Alan

but what you have got wrong was the fact that the rules for civ/eng wrere changed after that game giving an advantage and an unfair advantage to the player controling (and that's any player not a slight at Tom or anyone else for that matter) them since they can't be killed.

As their classified as "mobile battle objectives" worth 50 RP's during a battle

What's to stop us trying to win them back

So we could change the rules so that you are happy....what would you like to see

Play the rules as is.

Each platoon in a company may include up to three civil
engineers;

Each engineer can be integrated to one of the company’s
infantry units for free. A unit can only include one civil engineer.

A civil engineer who suffers an impact is immediately eliminated.


No damage test is required. Nonetheless he can be
saved using abilities that allow this (“Medic!”, and so on).

Them's the rules and they work for me.

They wont work for the good of the campaign

They don't work for anyone other than the Oni right now so how does that benefit the campagne.

They don't work for anyone other than the Oni right now so how does that benefit the campagne.

Bollocks

Yet another classic one word post from the master of debate.

Actually I think we should have won one in the last battle since the ONi ran away And he wasn't exactly aggressive

Something stated with one word can have more meaning than War & Peace

i dont have any King Tigers (new term for type 3 AFV)